Our main research programme, the Long Range Science Strategy (LRSS), is supported and funded by a consortium of Cosmetics Europe (CE) Members and Associate Members (non CE). Started in 2016 and scheduled to run until 2020, it comprises a number of partners working together across the most relevant areas for evaluating the safety of cosmetic ingredients. These can be divided in local effects and systemic effects. Typical examples of local effects are eye irritation and severe eye damage, skin irritation and corrosion. Liver toxicity for instance would be an example of a systemic effect.
The emphasis of the programme is on systemic effects which relates to internal exposure i.e., when a substance reaches the blood stream in sufficient quantities to trigger an effect at cell organ level, irrespective of the route of exposure.
Toxicologists traditionally address systemic toxicity by studying two main components: kinetics often called toxicokinetics (TK) and toxicodynamics (TD). TK concerns absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of a substance in the organism or cell system. TD results from the interference of the substance with the normal functioning of the organism and its toxicity effects.
Our TD and TK projects provide complementary information, and a strategic combination of their methodologies will help us build new approaches to systemic toxicity safety assessment.
The data and outcomes generated in each of these research areas have already allowed us to develop several robust safety assessment approaches based on alternative methods.
The evaluation of chemicals for safety assessment purposes requires to not only consider the potential systemic toxicity effects but also the likelihood of these effects to occur. Hazard identification is part of this process and consists in envisaging potential adverse effects in cases where physiological adaptation capacities (homeostasis) of the human organism are overwhelmed by the exposure to a chemical. The evaluation of the exposure is another part of this process and when it shows that when the chemical is, in the systemic compartment, below a certain level, then the adaptation capacities are kept and the probabilities of adverse effect are low. Hence, considering both hazard and exposure elements allows to estimate these probabilities, thus performing risk assessment, and supports the safety assessments of chemicals. The LRSS has the ambition to enable such safety assessments of cosmetic substances through non-animal new approach methodologies (NAMs), and develop these so called new generation risk assessments (NGRAs).
In order to meet this goal, the LRSS has three pillars:
The LRSS intends to employ these pillars throughout several case studies. The following paragraphs explain the programme in further detail
Topical toxicity includes effects occurring at the levels of the eye and the skin. Eye irritation and severe eye damage are two ocular local effects that are respectively reversible and non-reversible. Cosmetics Europe eye irritation programme developed and optimised several non-animal test methods to evaluate the ocular toxicity of substances, including cosmetic ingredients. As such, several test methods are OECD accepted test guidelines and can be applied widely also in other sectors. The eye programme now focuses on how these methods can be combined in an adequate way to address a wide array of ocular effects – for instance via the so called Defined Approaches — and improve the predictions across the entire range of classes for this endpoint. Skin irritation and corrosion are dermal damages respectively reversible and non-reversible. Cosmetics Europe has played a major role in developing numerous test methods that address these effects. In topical toxicity, beyond individual test methods, various test method combinations are now common practice, and have been published by the OECD in its guidance documents on Integrated Approaches for Testing and Assessment (IATAs).
Our Genotoxicity Programme aims to develop new in vitro assays which are more relevant and predictive for the dermal route of exposure than the tests available today. It focuses on developing assays that use reconstructed human skin tissues. These tissues are morphologically very similar to human skin in particular 3-dimensional (3D) models have shown high predictability of the genotoxicity of substances via the dermal route of exposure. Currently they are being used in two different methods : the Micronucleus and Comet assays. Both have the potential to be combined with the standard battery of in vitro tests to improve their predictions, especially the rates of irrelevant positives. The 3D-assays are under evaluation to substantiate and foresee their regulatory use and acceptance.
We are working to strengthen our understanding of how chemicals react with the skin and activate the body’s immune system to cause allergic contact dermatitis. As this affects approximately 15-20% of the human population, LRSS has a dedicated programme to develop a full set of in vitro methods that can be used to determine the ability of cosmetic ingredients to cause skin allergy. However, reaching this ambitious goal is demanding due to the complex biology behind the induction of allergic contact dermatitis.
Several in vitro methods for skin sensitization have been developed by Cosmetics Europe members or through joint projects with Cosmetics Europe. The current challenge is developing a testing strategy that would be fit- for-purpose for the prediction of sensitization hazard and potency. Such strategies can in principle be applied for any substance and therefore can be of use to other sectors and products.
To achieve the goal above we have screened, identified and evaluated 16 different in vitro test methods over the past years and in a second stage compared the performance of a subset of these methods with historical animal data (LLNA) and human data. Our next step in this work is the analysing the applicability domains of the in vitro methods by testing substances with challenging characteristics.
Our current knowledge suggests that more than one alternative method will be needed to decide if a chemical can induce skin sensitisation in human. The combination of more than one method is called a defined approach or testing strategy. Many approaching combining different in vitro methods for skin sensitisation have been published in the recent years and we have used our data set to challenge the defined approaches for their capability to predict skin sensitisation. The evaluation showed that several non-animal testing strategies incorporating in vitro, in chemico, and in silico inputs demonstrated equivalent or superior performance to the animal assay when compared to both animal and human data.
To complete the array of methods and approaches we will be exploring further the options for the use of T cell assays in a case study scenario and we will work on a research project where the main objective is to investigate the possibility of developing a quantitative chemical reactivity mapping of skin sensitizers in a living human epidermis model.
Our work in the field of toxicokinetics aims to improve our understanding of how substances behave when applied to the skin and potentially enter into the systemic circulation. Specifically, our research addresses a multitude of toxicokinetic parameters to estimate internal dosage in relation to external exposure. This requires data on consumer exposure and the use of in silico and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to help predict the systemic concentration of the chemical in relation to dermal exposure. The generation of in vitro administration, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) data to support in silico and PBPK models may also be needed at this stage. Our work will be split into several projects:
Our toxicodynamics (TD) project focuses on the toxicological mechanisms that may be triggered by exposure to a chemical, aiming to better understand the molecular and cellular effects that cause adverse effects at the level of organs. The main components of the project are:
The toxicodynamics projects are complementary to the toxicokinetics ones, and we designed them to allow their matching and enable the assessment of systemic toxicity.
Our research includes a series of case studies on systemic toxicity evaluation. These case studies are applied safety assessments of certain chemicals, based on non-animal new approach methodologies (NAMs) and show performance of new generation risk assessments (NGRA). They aim to practically implement, test and refine our scientific workflow. For instance, in systemic toxicity, this workflow uses the approaches that we develop in the toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic projects, and strategically combines them. This workflow allows concluding on the safety of a chemical by using a set of NAMs which are based on the level of exposure to a certain chemical and on the data availability for the chemical which we want to evaluate and its analogues. These approaches are the thresholds of toxicological concerns (TTC), internal TTC, chemical and biological read across, and ab initio approaches. When NAMs data are not available, for the chemicals of interest, we generate them e.g., skin penetration, or transcriptomics data. Our case studies series aims at benefiting to the whole safety assessment community and as such is opened to partnerships, including regulatory advisory bodies.
As part of its Long Range Science Strategy 2016-2020, Cosmetics Europe is working to explore scientifically robust methods for gathering representative cosmetic ingredient concentration data and assessing aggregate exposure to cosmetics ingredients with the aim to improve exposure assessment. With the present project, Cosmetics Europe will test the suitability of the existing Creme Global aggregate exposure system to model aggregate exposure of cosmetic chemicals.
The cosmetic ingredients under study in this part of the programme will be common to those being examined elsewhere within the LRSS program. This ensures that assessments of chemical hazard via read across and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models developed can be considered in tandem with robust exposure assessments, so that broader conclusions can be drawn on their overall safety and risk. For example, PBPK models can be linked to exposure models to generate estimates of internal exposure to chemicals (and Creme Global is currently involved in similar initiatives for agro-chemicals). Furthermore, this commonality of chemicals under study will facilitate future analyses that will integrate different models for risk assessment, and demonstrate the applicability of complete safety assessments in the absence of animal testing data.
To summarise, the main objectives of the proposed study are two-fold: